EPYC 7252 vs Atom N270

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N270 and EPYC 7252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.76
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data9.64
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and EPYC 7252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1231
L1 cache56 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and EPYC 7252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPBGA437TR4
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and EPYC 7252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N270 and EPYC 7252 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and EPYC 7252 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and EPYC 7252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N270 136
EPYC 7252 19411
+14173%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 7 August 2019
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 120 Watt

Atom N270 has 5900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7252, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N270 and EPYC 7252. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N270 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7252 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and EPYC 7252, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
AMD EPYC 7252
EPYC 7252

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 225 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N270 or EPYC 7252, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.