Duron 650 vs Atom N2650

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2650 and Duron 650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Duron
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years ago)15 January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom N2650 and Duron 650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz0.65 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data6.5
L2 cache1 MB64 KB
Chip lithography32 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Number of transistorsno data25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2650 and Duron 650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)3,6 Watt29.4 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2650 and Duron 650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 15 January 2001
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 29 Watt

Atom N2650 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 866.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2650 and Duron 650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2650 is a notebook processor while Duron 650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2650 and Duron 650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2650
Atom N2650
AMD Duron 650
Duron 650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 8 votes

Rate Atom N2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Duron 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2650 or Duron 650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.