Duron 650 vs Atom N2650
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2650 and Duron 650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD Duron |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) | 15 January 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2650 and Duron 650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 0.65 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 6.5 |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2650 and Duron 650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3,6 Watt | 24.3 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2650 and Duron 650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2012 | 15 January 2001 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 24 Watt |
Atom N2650 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2650 and Duron 650. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom N2650 is a notebook processor while Duron 650 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2650 and Duron 650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
