Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Atom N2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated941
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.74
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Renoir (2020−2022)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)21 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data
Current price$251 (5.3x MSRP)$123

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size66 mm2156 mm2
Number of transistors176 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)3.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2.44 GB128 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N2600 360
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 10925
+2935%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Atom N2600 by 2935% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N2600 75
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 1458
+1844%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Atom N2600 by 1844% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N2600 210
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 4662
+2120%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Atom N2600 by 2120% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 21 July 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 171 vote

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 444 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2600 or Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.