Atom Z560 vs E680

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E680 and Atom Z560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameTunnel Creek (2010)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date14 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom E680 and Atom Z560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.13 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size26 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors47 million47 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Atom E680 and Atom Z560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA 676PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680 and Atom Z560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom E680 and Atom Z560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E680 and Atom Z560 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680 and Atom Z560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2unknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 600-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 September 2010 1 June 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 2 Watt

Atom E680 has an age advantage of 3 months.

Atom Z560, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom E680 and Atom Z560. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E680 and Atom Z560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E680
Atom E680
Intel Atom Z560
Atom Z560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Atom Z560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E680 or Atom Z560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.