Intel Atom E660: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Atom E660 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.17% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.
Summary
Intel started Atom E660 sales 14 September 2010 at a recommended price of $54. This is a Tunnel Creek architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 1 core and 2 threads, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1300 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is Intel BGA 676 processor with a TDP of 3 Watt. It supports DDR2 memory.
Primary details
Atom E660 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in the ranking | 3275 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Power efficiency | 5.33 | of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U) |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | of 17,906 (Xeon Platinum 8280L) |
Detailed specifications
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | |
| Threads | 2 | |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | of 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS) |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | of 80 KB (EPYC 9965) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | of 2 MB (Xeon 6980P) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | of 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | of 3 nm (Core Ultra 9 285K) |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | of 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X) |
| 64 bit support | - | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E660 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | of 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Atom E660. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Atom E660's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of a GPU integrated into Atom E660.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 600 |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Atom E660. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Send your test results of Atom E660.
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Atom E660 is Mobile Sempron 3400+, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our ranking.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Atom E660:
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
