Celeron N5105 vs Atom E640

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1733
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data24.17
Architecture codenameTunnel Creek (2010)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date14 September 2010 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size26 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors47 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 676FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E640 and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E640 and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 600Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom E640 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E640 and Celeron N5105.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 September 2010 11 January 2021
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 10 Watt

Atom E640 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom E640 and Celeron N5105. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom E640 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E640 and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E640
Atom E640
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Atom E640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 693 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E640 or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.