Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Atom E3845
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Atom E3845 by a whopping 539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom E3845 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2739 | 1375 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Atom | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 6.22 | 26.51 |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 8 October 2013 (11 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom E3845 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.91 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4950 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E3845 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA1170 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3845 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3845 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3845 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.66 | 4.22 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 4.50 |
| Recency | 8 October 2013 | 21 February 2018 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom E3845 has 50% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B, on the other hand, has a 539.4% higher aggregate performance score, 484.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3845 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom E3845 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded V1605B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3845 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
