Opteron 154 vs Atom E3827

Place in the ranking	3111	3113
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Atom	no data
Power efficiency	3.43	0.26
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Venus (2004−2005)
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	2 August 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom E3827 and Opteron 154 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	no data	2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.75 GHz	2.8 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	90 nm
Die size	no data	115 mm²
Number of transistors	no data	114 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3827 and Opteron 154 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	Intel BGA1170	939
Power consumption (TDP)	8 Watt	104 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3827 and Opteron 154. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3827 and Opteron 154. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom E3827 0.29

Opteron 154 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E3827 463
+1.3%

Opteron 154 457

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Recency	8 October 2013	2 August 2005
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	22 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	8 Watt	104 Watt

Atom E3827 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom E3827 and Opteron 154.

Be aware that Atom E3827 is a notebook processor while Opteron 154 is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3827 and Opteron 154, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.