Mobile Sempron 3000+ vs Atom E3825

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E3825 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAtomMobile Sempron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-I (2013)Paris
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$73no data

Detailed specifications

Atom E3825 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nmno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3825 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3825 and Mobile Sempron 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3825 and Mobile Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphicsno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E3825 378
+40.5%
Mobile Sempron 3000+ 269

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

Atom E3825 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom E3825 and Mobile Sempron 3000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3825 and Mobile Sempron 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E3825
Atom E3825
AMD Mobile Sempron 3000+
Mobile Sempron 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Atom E3825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E3825 or Mobile Sempron 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.