Atom C3338 vs D525

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D525 and Atom C3338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2751
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiencyno data6.83
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)22 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D525 and Atom C3338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C89 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D525 and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D525 and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D525 and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D525 and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D525 and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size4 GB128 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D525 and Atom C3338.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data10
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data10
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data10
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D525 402
Atom C3338 1028
+156%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2010 22 February 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 8 Watt

Atom D525 has 100% more threads.

Atom C3338, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom D525 and Atom C3338. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom D525 is a notebook processor while Atom C3338 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D525 and Atom C3338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D525
Atom D525
Intel Atom C3338
Atom C3338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 217 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D525 or Atom C3338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.