Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Atom D525

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D525
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.25
Athlon 64 FX-60
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 110 Watt
0.45
+80%

Athlon 64 FX-60 outperforms Atom D525 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31612952
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency1.820.39
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Toledo (2006)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size66 mm2199 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors176 million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559939
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3no data
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D525 0.25
Athlon 64 FX-60 0.45
+80%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D525 404
Athlon 64 FX-60 709
+75.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.45
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 110 Watt

Atom D525 has 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 746.2% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 FX-60, on the other hand, has a 80% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D525 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D525 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-60 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D525 and Athlon 64 FX-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D525
Atom D525
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60
Athlon 64 FX-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 218 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D525 or Athlon 64 FX-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.