Atom C3958 vs D510

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D510
2009
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.26
Atom C3958
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.47
+850%

Atom C3958 outperforms Atom D510 by a whopping 850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D510 and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31591762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.54
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.887.50
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date21 December 2009 (14 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D510 and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64 KB (per core)896 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C83 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D510 and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D510 and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D510 and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D510 and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D510 and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size4 GB256 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D510 and Atom C3958.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D510 0.26
Atom C3958 2.47
+850%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D510 406
Atom C3958 3929
+868%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 2.47
Recency 21 December 2009 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 31 Watt

Atom D510 has 138.5% lower power consumption.

Atom C3958, on the other hand, has a 850% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Atom C3958 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D510 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D510 is a notebook processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D510 and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D510
Atom D510
Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 52 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D510 or Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.