Atom N270 vs D425

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D425
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.13
+44.4%
Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.09

Atom D425 outperforms Atom N270 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D425 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33333380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.233.41
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$993$44

Detailed specifications

Atom D425 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors123 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Atom D425 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States--
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom D425 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3no data
Maximum memory size4 GB8 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D425 0.13
+44.4%
Atom N270 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D425 204
+50%
Atom N270 136

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 0.09
Recency 21 June 2010 2 April 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 2 Watt

Atom D425 has a 44.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Atom D425 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D425 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D425
Atom D425
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 249 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D425 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.