Celeron 837 vs Atom D2700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2700 and Celeron 837 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date28 December 2011 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D2700 and Celeron 837 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.13 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size66 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors176 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2700 and Celeron 837 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2700 and Celeron 837. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
AMT-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data

Security technologies

Atom D2700 and Celeron 837 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2700 and Celeron 837 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2700 and Celeron 837. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size4 GB16 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2700 and Celeron 837 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2700 and Celeron 837.

PCI Express lanes4no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data

Pros & cons summary


Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

Atom D2700 has 100% more threads, and 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom D2700 and Celeron 837. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2700 and Celeron 837, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2700
Atom D2700
Intel Celeron 837
Celeron 837

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 27 votes

Rate Atom D2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 837 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2700 or Celeron 837, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.