Ultra 9 288V vs Atom D2560

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D2560
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.27
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.44
+4507%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Atom D2560 by a whopping 4507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3135624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.5439.04
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date24 October 2012 (12 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.91V -1.21Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA559Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)Arc 140V

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D2560 0.27
Ultra 9 288V 12.44
+4507%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D2560 433
Ultra 9 288V 19761
+4464%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 12.44
Recency 24 October 2012 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 30 Watt

Atom D2560 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 4507.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2560 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2560
Atom D2560
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom D2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 33 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2560 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.