Xeon D-1813NT vs Atom D2550
Primary details
Comparing Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1237 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.97 |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 1 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 10240 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 42 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| VT-i | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 November 2011 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 42 Watt |
Atom D2550 has 320% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-1813NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom D2550 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1813NT is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2550 and Xeon D-1813NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
