A4-1350 vs Atom D2550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D2550
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.26
A4-1350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.57
+119%

A4-1350 outperforms Atom D2550 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2550 and A4-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31542826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.466.74
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)18 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom D2550 and A4-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size66 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors176 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2550 and A4-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FT3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2550 and A4-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2550 and A4-1350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data
VT-i-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2550 and A4-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8210 (300 MHz)

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2550 and A4-1350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2550 and A4-1350.

PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D2550 0.26
A4-1350 0.57
+119%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D2550 409
A4-1350 911
+123%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.57
Recency 1 November 2011 18 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 8 Watt

A4-1350 has a 119.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and 25% lower power consumption.

The A4-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2550 and A4-1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2550
Atom D2550
AMD A4-1350
A4-1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate Atom D2550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate A4-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2550 or A4-1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.