Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Atom D2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Oakville (2003−2004)
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)August 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K
L2 cache512K (per core)512K
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size66 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors176 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559754
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
AMT-no data
HD Audio+no data

Security technologies

Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMAno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

PCI Express lanes4no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D2500 241
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ 440
+82.6%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Atom D2500 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2500 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 36 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2500 or Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.