i7-8670T vs Atom CE4150
Primary details
Comparing Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Sodaville (2009) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 24 September 2009 (14 years ago) | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 96 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 951 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 September 2009 | 1 September 2018 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom CE4150 has 400% lower power consumption.
i7-8670T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom CE4150 is a notebook processor while Core i7-8670T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom CE4150 and Core i7-8670T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
