EPYC 7302P vs Atom C3950

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.67
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data12.54
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389$825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier1730
L1 cache896 KB1 MB
L2 cache16 MB8 MB
L3 cache16 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310TR4
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 7 August 2019
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 155 Watt

Atom C3950 has 545.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7302P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3950 and EPYC 7302P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3950
Atom C3950
AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 17 votes

Rate Atom C3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3950 or EPYC 7302P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.