EPYC 9275F vs Atom C3850

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Turin (2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$323$3,439

Detailed specifications

Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1248
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache672 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1310SP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes16128
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 12 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 320 Watt

Atom C3850 has 1180% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3850 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3850
Atom C3850
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3850 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.