Xeon W-3365 vs Atom C3808

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated88
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data13.03
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache672 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX--
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365.

PCIe version34
PCI Express lanes1664
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 29 July 2021
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 270 Watt

Atom C3808 has 980% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3365, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3808 and Xeon W-3365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808
Intel Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3808 or Xeon W-3365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.