EPYC 9965 vs Atom C3808

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Turin (2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369$14,813

Detailed specifications

Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)192
Threads12384
Base clock speed2 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache672 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1310SP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes16128
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 192
Threads 12 384
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 500 Watt

Atom C3808 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3808 and EPYC 9965, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808
AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3808 or EPYC 9965, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.