EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Atom C3758

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1657not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.52no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency10.98no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$880

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.15 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier2221.5
L1 cache448 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data2x 213 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size256 GB1 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1664
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 21 February 2018
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt

Atom C3758 has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3451, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and EPYC Embedded 3451, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451
EPYC Embedded 3451

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC Embedded 3451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3758 or EPYC Embedded 3451, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.