Celeron 4305U vs Atom C3758

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
3.01
+155%

Atom C3758 outperforms Celeron 4305U by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16512372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.68no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiency10.987.17
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)16 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplier2222
L1 cache448 KB128 KB
L2 cache16 MB512 KB
L3 cache16 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature82 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA1528
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGX-Yes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size256 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 8th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3758 3.01
+155%
Celeron 4305U 1.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3758 4614
+155%
Celeron 4305U 1807

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.01 1.18
Recency 15 August 2017 16 April 2019
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Atom C3758 has a 155.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron 4305U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Atom C3758 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305U in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3758 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 4305U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and Celeron 4305U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758
Intel Celeron 4305U
Celeron 4305U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Celeron 4305U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3758 or Celeron 4305U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.