Xeon D-2896TER vs Atom C3538

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2347not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency7.51no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)no data
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads440
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache224 KBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB1 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes1232
USB revision33.0
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports1224
Number of USB ports84
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 1 October 2023
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 40
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

Atom C3538 has 633.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2896TER, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Xeon D-2896TER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538
Intel Xeon D-2896TER
Xeon D-2896TER

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2896TER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3538 or Xeon D-2896TER, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.