Processor 300 vs Atom C3508

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3508
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
1.17
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.68
+300%

Processor 300 outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3508 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23791304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency9.489.28
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Atom C3508 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache224 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3508 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3508 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3508 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3508 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3508 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3508 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom C3508 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom C3508 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3508 and Processor 300.

PCIe version35.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes816
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports8no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports8no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3508 1.17
Processor 300 4.68
+300%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3508 1796
Processor 300 7160
+299%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 4.68
Recency 15 August 2017 8 January 2024
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 46 Watt

Atom C3508 has 100% more physical cores, and 318.2% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 years.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3508 is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3508 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3508 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.