Celeron G5900T vs Atom C3338

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3338
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 8 Watt
0.65
Celeron G5900T
2020
2 threads, 35 Watt
1.36
+109%

Celeron G5900T outperforms Atom C3338 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27482236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency6.813.66
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)no data
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB2 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature89 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)8.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGX-Yes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1016
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports10no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports10no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3338 0.65
Celeron G5900T 1.36
+109%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3338 1028
Celeron G5900T 2155
+110%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 1.36
Recency 22 February 2017 1 April 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

Atom C3338 has 337.5% lower power consumption.

Celeron G5900T, on the other hand, has a 109.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Celeron G5900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3338 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3338 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G5900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3338 and Celeron G5900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3338
Atom C3338
Intel Celeron G5900T
Celeron G5900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron G5900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3338 or Celeron G5900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.