FX-8100 vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and FX-8100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.62
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and FX-8100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support533.33 MT/sno data
L1 cache112 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and FX-8100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and FX-8100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and FX-8100 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and FX-8100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and FX-8100.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

Atom 330 363
FX-8100 4046
+1015%

FX-8100 outperforms Atom 330 by 1015% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 12 October 2011
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 95 Watt

Atom 330 has 1087.5% lower power consumption.

FX-8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and FX-8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while FX-8100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and FX-8100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD FX-8100
FX-8100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 58 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 61 vote

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or FX-8100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.