Atom D425 vs 330

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23
+76.9%
Atom D425
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.13

Atom 330 outperforms Atom D425 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31863345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.711.22
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$993

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size51.9276 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors94 Million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 330 0.23
+76.9%
Atom D425 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
+77.9%
Atom D425 204

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.13
Recency 2 April 2008 21 June 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 10 Watt

Atom 330 has a 76.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

Atom D425, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Atom 330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D425 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.