Ryzen 5 2600 vs Atom 230

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated900
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data12.09
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1234
L1 cache56 KB576 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C95 °C
Number of transistors47 Million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437AM4
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
Ryzen 5 2600 13190
+7705%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom 230 557
Ryzen 5 2600 4726
+748%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom 230 851
Ryzen 5 2600 28173
+3211%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 13 April 2018
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

Atom 230 has 1525% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 230 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 55 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14844 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.