Celeron G4900 vs Atom 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data2.63
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)2 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBDMI 3.0
Bus rate533.33 MT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1231
L1 cache56 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memory-64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency-1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom 230 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Celeron G4900.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
Celeron G4900 2394
+1317%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 2 April 2018
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 54 Watt

Atom 230 has 1250% lower power consumption.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Celeron G4900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 230 is a notebook processor while Celeron G4900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 115 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.