Celeron 837 vs Atom 230

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Celeron 837 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Celeron 837 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeFSBDMI 2.0
Bus rate533.33 MT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1218
L1 cache56 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Celeron 837 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437no data
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Celeron 837. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Celeron 837 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Celeron 837 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Celeron 837. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1333
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 17 Watt

Atom 230 has 325% lower power consumption.

Celeron 837, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Celeron 837. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Celeron 837, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
Intel Celeron 837
Celeron 837

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 837 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Celeron 837, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.