Atom E665C vs Athlon XP-M 3000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Atom E665C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Stellarton (2010) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | 22 November 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Atom E665C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Atom E665C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | Intel BGA1466 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Atom E665C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Atom E665C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 600 |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 4 Watt |
Atom E665C has 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1025% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Atom E665C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Atom E665C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
