Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Athlon XP-M 2200+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 441 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon XP-M | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 52.63 |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 19 July 2004 (20 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $97 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 12.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 54 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 July 2004 | 3 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 28 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 2200+ has 3.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
