Ultra 7 265KF vs Athlon XP-M 2100+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated73
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon XP-Mno data
Power efficiencyno data29.53
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date17 March 2004 (20 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Die size101 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors54 Million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket 5631851
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2004 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon XP-M 2100+ has 400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon XP-M 2100+ is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 2100+ and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP-M 2100+
Athlon XP-M 2100+
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 24 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP-M 2100+ or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.