Ultra 7 265K vs Athlon XP-M 1700+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated85
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.56
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon XP-Mno data
Power efficiencyno data28.16
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date12 March 2003 (21 year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$123$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.47 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Die size85 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors37 Million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket 563FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-6400
Maximum memory size4 GB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2003 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon XP-M 1700+ has 400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 year, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon XP-M 1700+ is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+
Athlon XP-M 1700+
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 87 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP-M 1700+ or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.