Xeon D-1702 vs Athlon XP 3100+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3254 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.25 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Thorton (2001−2003) | no data |
| Release date | December 2003 (20 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon D-1702 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 172% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon XP 3100+ is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1702 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 3100+ and Xeon D-1702, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
