Mobile Sempron 3200+ vs Athlon XP 2600+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 2600+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Sempron
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2004)Keene
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 2600+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512Kno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nmno data
Die size101 mm2no data
Number of transistors63 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 2600+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAno data
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt25 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon XP 2600+ 242
Mobile Sempron 3200+ 245
+1.2%

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 25 Watt

Mobile Sempron 3200+ has 172% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 2600+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon XP 2600+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Sempron 3200+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 2600+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 2600+
Athlon XP 2600+
AMD Mobile Sempron 3200+
Mobile Sempron 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 22 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Mobile Sempron 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 2600+ or Mobile Sempron 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.