Xeon Gold 5320T vs Athlon XP 2400+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Thorton (2001−2003) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | August 2002 (22 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 80 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 86 °C |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | A | 4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2993 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 20 |
| Threads | 1 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 150 Watt |
Athlon XP 2400+ has 120.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5320T, on the other hand, has 1900% more physical cores and 3900% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon XP 2400+ is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5320T is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 2400+ and Xeon Gold 5320T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
