Ryzen 5 1300 vs Athlon XP 1600+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 1600+ and Ryzen 5 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3359not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.17no data
Architecture codenameThoroughbred (2001−2002)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 1600+ and Ryzen 5 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm14 nm
Die size150 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors37 million4800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 1600+ and Ryzen 5 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAAM4
Power consumption (TDP)63 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 1600+ and Ryzen 5 1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 1600+ and Ryzen 5 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 63 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon XP 1600+ has 3.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 1300, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 1600+ and Ryzen 5 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 1600+ and Ryzen 5 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 1600+
Athlon XP 1600+
AMD Ryzen 5 1300
Ryzen 5 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 16 votes

Rate Athlon XP 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 1600+ or Ryzen 5 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.