Xeon Gold 6338 vs Athlon X4 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 970
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.71
Xeon Gold 6338
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
21.86
+1178%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms Athlon X4 970 by a whopping 1178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1958222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.83
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$59 $1771

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 970 1.71
Xeon Gold 6338 21.86
+1178%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms Athlon X4 970 by 1178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 970 2644
Xeon Gold 6338 33814
+1179%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms Athlon X4 970 by 1179% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.71 21.86
Recency 27 July 2017 1 April 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6338 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 970 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 970 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6338 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 970 and Xeon Gold 6338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 970
Athlon X4 970
Intel Xeon Gold 6338
Xeon Gold 6338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 111 votes

Rate Athlon X4 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 970 or Xeon Gold 6338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.