Xeon Platinum 8280 vs Athlon X4 940
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 270 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.66 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.52 |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| Release date | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 11 December 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $10,009 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 27 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 84 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 July 2017 | 11 December 2018 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 28 |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Athlon X4 940 has 215.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8280, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon X4 940 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8280 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 940 and Xeon Platinum 8280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
