Athlon X4 950 vs Athlon X4 845

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 845
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.48
+5.5%

Athlon X4 845 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17661807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.66
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.483.30
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 February 2016 (8 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache320K128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4 Dual-channel

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 845 2.48
+5.5%
Athlon X4 950 2.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 845 3796
+5.6%
Athlon X4 950 3596

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X4 845 662
+0.9%
Athlon X4 950 656

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X4 845 1630
+0.6%
Athlon X4 950 1621

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.48 2.35
Recency 2 February 2016 27 July 2017

Athlon X4 845 has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon X4 950, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 845 and Athlon X4 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 845
Athlon X4 845
AMD Athlon X4 950
Athlon X4 950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 80 votes

Rate Athlon X4 845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 283 votes

Rate Athlon X4 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 845 or Athlon X4 950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.