E-350 vs Athlon X4 750K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 750K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.80
+567%

Athlon X4 750K outperforms E-350 by a whopping 567% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 750K and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20083132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.701.42
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 750K and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache192K64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size246 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 750K and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FT1
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 750K and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 750K and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 750K and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 750K and E-350.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 750K 1.80
+567%
E-350 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 750K 2861
+580%
E-350 421

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X4 750K 443
+318%
E-350 106

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X4 750K 1013
+457%
E-350 182

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 0.27
Recency 2 October 2012 4 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 18 Watt

Athlon X4 750K has a 566.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

E-350, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X4 750K is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 750K is a desktop processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 750K and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 750K
Athlon X4 750K
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 144 votes

Rate Athlon X4 750K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 750K or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.