Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Athlon X2 QL-65

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlonno data
Power efficiencyno data60.40
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Strix Point (2024)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-65 609
Ryzen AI 9 365 28388
+4561%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1630
Ryzen AI 9 365 8446
+418%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon X2 QL-65 3213
Ryzen AI 9 365 45453
+1315%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1489
Ryzen AI 9 365 14361
+864%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon X2 QL-65 39
Ryzen AI 9 365 6.7
+482%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 365 has 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 37 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-65 or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.