A4-3310MX vs Athlon X2 QL-64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-64
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.35

A4-3310MX outperforms Athlon X2 QL-64 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33043178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD A-Series
Power efficiencyno data1.38
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 January 2009 (16 years ago)14 June 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-64 and A4-3310MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-64 and A4-3310MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1FS1
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and A4-3310MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and A4-3310MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and A4-3310MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X2 QL-64 0.35
A4-3310MX 0.45
+28.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-64 622
A4-3310MX 800
+28.6%
Samples: 52

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X2 QL-64 201
A4-3310MX 292
+45.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X2 QL-64 384
A4-3310MX 502
+30.7%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon X2 QL-64 42.8
A4-3310MX 41.5
+3.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.45
Recency 1 January 2009 14 June 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-64 has 3400% lower power consumption.

A4-3310MX, on the other hand, has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD A4-3310MX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
Athlon X2 QL-64
AMD A4-3310MX
A4-3310MX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 38 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate A4-3310MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X2 QL-64 and A4-3310MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.