Pentium 4-M 548 vs Athlon X2 QL-62

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-62 and Pentium 4-M 548 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonPentium 4-M
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-62 and Pentium 4-M 548 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-62 and Pentium 4-M 548 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1g2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt88 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-62 and Pentium 4-M 548. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-62 and Pentium 4-M 548 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 88 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-62 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 151.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-62 and Pentium 4-M 548. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-62 and Pentium 4-M 548, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-62
Athlon X2 QL-62
Intel Pentium 4-M 548
Pentium 4-M 548

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 24 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M 548 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-62 or Pentium 4-M 548, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.