Ryzen 3 8300G vs Athlon X2 QL-60

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-60
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.34
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
9.01
+2550%

Ryzen 3 8300G outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by a whopping 2550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3070854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.47
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency0.9213.11
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data137 mm2
Number of transistorsno data20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-60 0.34
Ryzen 3 8300G 9.01
+2550%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-60 547
Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
+2517%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 9.01
Recency 3 June 2008 8 January 2024
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-60 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has a 2550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 8300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 QL-60 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon X2 QL-60 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
Athlon X2 QL-60
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-60 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.