E1-2100 vs Athlon X2 L310

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 L310
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 13 Watt
0.21
E1-2100
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.26
+23.8%

E1-2100 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32153158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.532.73
Architecture codenameConesus (2009)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA / 638 lidless micro-PGAFT3
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus ProtectionMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, BMI1, ABM, SVM, AES-NI
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8210
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 L310 0.21
E1-2100 0.26
+23.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 L310 335
E1-2100 406
+21.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X2 L310 116
+23.4%
E1-2100 94

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X2 L310 199
+22.8%
E1-2100 162

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon X2 L310 987
+29%
E1-2100 765

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon X2 L310 1747
+21.7%
E1-2100 1435

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 L310 866
+12.2%
E1-2100 772

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon X2 L310 104.35
+2.5%
E1-2100 106.95

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.26
Recency 10 September 2009 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 9 Watt

E1-2100 has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The E1-2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 L310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 L310 and E1-2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310
AMD E1-2100
E1-2100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 12 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 321 vote

Rate E1-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 L310 or E1-2100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.